Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

longship

(40,416 posts)
8. She says no. And has said so many times. Isn't that enough?
Thu Jan 15, 2015, 09:26 PM
Jan 2015

I will pose the question I posed the other day.

Is this an Elizabeth Warren support group (which I wholeheartedly support).

Or is this a group who only posits Elizabeth Warren as a Presidential candidate, which she has clearly and repeatedly stated that she is not interested in?

I support Elizabeth Warren unequivocally. Others here apparently think she is equivocating, or something, about her repeated denials. I would prefer having an Elizabeth Warren who does not equivocate.

This is where I make my stand in my support for Warren. If I thought she was equivocating, my support would not be as strong. I confess that I have a problem with such ethical issues.

Where do other Elizabeth Warren supporters stand on this? Is she just lying when she says she is not interested in running for POTUS?

This is an important issue here. Because some apparently cannot separate support for Liz from a wish for her to run as President. I choose to support her, and her decision. So why would you ban me unless this was the Elizabeth Warren for President Group. If it is that, you won't need to ban me; I will gladly go away.

Plus, I rather like her as a US Senator. God only knows that we need her there.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Elizabeth Warren»'Run Warren Run' hires Io...»Reply #8