Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Interfaith Group

No Vested Interest

(5,208 posts)

2. I have long been conscious that I would not qualify

Reply to hrmjustin (Original post)

Mon Jan 26, 2015, 04:46 PM

Jan 2015

Last edited Mon Jan 26, 2015, 06:35 PM - Edit history (1)

as a juror in a case where the death penalty is a possible choice.

To me, this seems wrong, in that I am part of the whole population of "peers" of the accused.
If a large portion of society does not believe in imposing the death penalty and are thus disqualified from serving, the accused is not getting a true cross-section of his/her "peers".

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Boston bombing jury excludes some Catholics [View all] hrmjustin Jan 2015 OP

This would exclude anyone, including atheists TexasProgresive Jan 2015 #1

I have long been conscious that I would not qualify No Vested Interest Jan 2015 #2