Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control Reform Activism

(9,951 posts)

1. But he did engage and kill him did he not?

Sat Oct 25, 2014, 12:46 PM

Oct 2014

Wouldn't that make him a good guy with a gun who stopped a bad guy with a gun?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Canadian Sgt@Arms was not carrying a gun [View all] jimmy the one Oct 2014 OP

But he did engage and kill him did he not? GGJohn Oct 2014 #1

It does indeed ClassyCaptain Oct 2014 #2

As, indeed, it points to the benefit of that shooter not having access to notrightatall Oct 2014 #5

Address the lever action -vs- AR15 with 30 round clip point. notrightatall Oct 2014 #3

You are aware that Canada does allow that rifle and mag? GGJohn Oct 2014 #7

Not that he could have purchased. notrightatall Oct 2014 #12

You're probably right. GGJohn Oct 2014 #13

speicous reasoning jimmy the one Oct 2014 #9

That's a fair observation, GGJohn Oct 2014 #10

Forget it. It's going to go right over the empty heads of the Aristus Oct 2014 #4

No, they "get it", they just don't care. notrightatall Oct 2014 #6

disruption from the lunatic fringe jimmy the one Oct 2014 #8

There's nothing new about DU's invasion by pro-gun militants, j-t-o. Paladin Oct 2014 #14