Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Android3.14

(5,402 posts)
12. Not going for that debate
Fri Aug 1, 2014, 10:59 AM
Aug 2014

People on both sides of the historical interpretation argument ignore the documentary evidence their opponents bring to the table. I'll stick with the purpose/function silliness.

I tend to use the generic "weapons" when I think of arms, and I think firearms are simply a subset.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control Reform Activism»So much for the "pes...»Reply #12