Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control Reform Activism

Showing Original Post only (View all)

billh58

(6,645 posts)
Wed Sep 7, 2016, 08:47 AM Sep 2016

A new legal assault on firearm makers: Some guns may be dangerous [View all]

Trouble is brewing in New England for gun manufacturers. The Massachusetts attorney general has launched an innovative investigation of major firearm makers based on her state’s expansive consumer-protection law.

The probe targets at least two companies—Glock Inc. and Remington Outdoor Co.—and possibly others. The investigation came to light because of lawsuits the gun companies recently filed seeking to block or narrow the Massachusetts safety investigation, calling it overly intrusive. The defensive litigation stated that Attorney General Maura Healey is demanding that Glock and Remington surrender a wide range of internal documents, including safety-related complaints from customers.

- Snip -

Since the Glock was introduced in America 30 years ago, critics have said its design makes it more likely than other handguns to fire accidentally. For example, the Austrian gun fires with relatively little pressure from the shooter’s index finger, and it has an unconventional safety mechanism built into its trigger, which some detractors say is ineffective. The company has responded that with proper training and careful technique, users will avoid accidental discharges.

Remington has had safety issues of its own. The company recently recalled two lines of rifles manufactured from 2006 through early 2014 because of accidental discharges. The recall notice stated to owners that “any unintended discharge has the potential for causing injury or death. Immediately stop using your rifle until Remington can inspect it to determine if the XMP trigger has excess bonding agent used in the assembly process, which could cause an unintentional discharge.”

http://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/a-new-legal-assault-on-firearm-makers-some-guns-may-be-dangerous/ar-AAizR0Y?li=BBnbfcL

Guns, it's worth noting, are one of the only products not regulated by the federal Consumer Product Safety Commission.

"with proper training and careful technique, users will avoid accidental discharges"...? Who is responsible for providing this "proper training?" And what in the hell is "careful technique?"

Bottom line? ALL guns are dangerous, and in the hands of inexperienced, untrained, average citizens they remain dangerous, yet almost anyone can buy and use a gun with little or no training. These same untrained gun owners are also "responsible" for leaving guns unsecured where 1.6 million children can (and do) pick them up and play with them with tragic results.

Vote for a Democrat who will stand up to the right-wing gun lobby, and help stop the gun violence madness in this country.
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control Reform Activism»A new legal assault on fi...»Reply #0