Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

billh58

(6,642 posts)
3. To carry that line of thinking one
Sun Aug 28, 2016, 04:57 PM
Aug 2016

step further, gun apologists also claim that it is not the gun, but the person holding the gun that is the problem and that we should do more to provide mental health care for potential killers, or suicidal individuals.

When it is suggested that potential gun purchasers be given a mental health or a behavioral evaluation, they scream, "that violates the Second Amendment!" In their twisted way of thinking then, we must afford everyone the "right" to purchase a deadly weapon and wait to see if they have anti-social issues.

This all goes back to their basic fundamentalist premise: a few American deaths and injuries (110,000+ annually) are acceptable in order to "protect" the right to ensure that any American (with few exceptions) who wants a gun can get one, and that basic safety measures for a dangerous product can not be mandated for the public good.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control Reform Activism»This message was self-del...»Reply #3