Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jmg257

(11,996 posts)
5. Interesting - they do know that Hamilton's proposition was NOT used when organizing the militia?
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 02:23 PM
Jun 2016

Federalist #29 is used quite often to show what was meant by "well-regulated" - nothing wrong there.

But the congress, in the Militia Act of 1792, indeed went with the existing practices (each and every free able-bodied white male citizen of the respective States) for composing the state militias, contrary to Hamilton's "select corps" notions. Rules of discipline/training were also mandated to ensure that they were trained/well-regulated.


Of course this did all change with the Dick Act, and the recreation of the State militias into the federal NG. That was over 100 years later.

Wholeheartedly agree the state militias are(were) govt entities, and should be well regulated (the NG today), and are NOT Bubba and his AK running around the woods.


ETA: after re-reading, that article isn't really so far off with regards to the state of the militias today, and the reduced importance of the 2nd because of it.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control Reform Activism»Opinion: What America’s g...»Reply #5