Nuclear Free

OKIsItJustMe

(21,210 posts)

4. Because I don’t think that creating such a group would be any more productive than creating this one

Fri May 25, 2012, 05:08 PM

May 2012

I tire of repetitious posts regarding the evils of the nuclear power industry (and I'm rather anti-nuke.) I also tire of the postings to the effect of, “Fukushima/Three Mile Island/Chernobyl really wasn’t all that bad.”

What’s sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. Either create 2 ghettos, or close this one down.

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This message was self-deleted by its author [View all] XemaSab May 2012 OP

It is a manifestation of your power trip...eom Kolesar May 2012 #1

When will the pro-nuclear group be created? OKIsItJustMe May 2012 #2

Why don't you go start a petition? XemaSab May 2012 #3

Because I don’t think that creating such a group would be any more productive than creating this one OKIsItJustMe May 2012 #4

Let's see how this group evolves XemaSab May 2012 #5

It does seem any "safe-haven" group SoutherDem May 2012 #7

We can debate nuclear policies in the normal E&E group ....... oldhippie Jun 2012 #8

Why would anyone want a group that is "safe" for a given point of view? PamW Jun 2012 #9

Well, yes, and no… OKIsItJustMe Jun 2012 #10

The whole concept of NUKE is and was always wrong.... Tikki May 2012 #6

Aboard Enola Gay I carry a curse Texas-Limerick Jun 2012 #11

This is wrong and I won't read/participate cprise Sep 2012 #12

Spam deleted by Violet_Crumble (MIR Team) canattack105 Oct 2012 #13