Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
DU Community Help
In reply to the discussion: Is there a way to add another alert reason for posting untrue information? [View all]highplainsdem
(53,341 posts)32. Re what you said about fact-checking just via replies...
When I see an OP that seems too good to be true, and I scroll down and a number of the replies say something like "Just so you know, this quote is false -- here's the true story," or whatever, that's good enough for me to disregard the info in the OP, or at least double-check it.
It's good that you scroll down the replies, at least when something seems iffy, so you'll notice any corrections of the OP there.
But a lot of DUers apparently DON'T ever look beyond the OP before replying or reccing, so we can end up with OPs that are very high on the Greatest Threads list long, long after multiple people have corrected them and pleaded with them to correct or delete the OP.
And every single mistaken rec increases the odds that there will be more recs and that the.OP, with its incorrect information, will get copied elsewhere.
LBN automatically asks people posting to check for duplicates.
Twitter has a system where you're sometimes asked, when you want to like a tweet linking to an article, if you want to read the article first. (I can't recall if that's only for tweets from a magazine's account. I know there have been times I've run into that after reading the article when an individual, maybe the author, had linked to it, but I still wanted to like the magazine's tweet about it if I saw it later.)
If there is no way to quickly deal with misinformation here, a reminder to DUers to check for any corrections in the replies before responding/reccing could be very useful - whether that reminder is automated or pinned to the top of GD (where this problem occurs most often).
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Is there a way to add another alert reason for posting untrue information? [View all]
beaglelover
Jul 2024
OP
Usually gets covered under the 'RW memes' or Conspiracy theories types alerts...
hlthe2b
Jul 2024
#1
Agreed, especially since one prolific newcomer seems intent on spreading disinformation
Maru Kitteh
Jul 2024
#3
The most important thing to do is post the facts in a response. That gets noticed quickly if enough people say,
Silent Type
Jul 2024
#8
We seem to have lots of folks willing to rec anything that makes them feel good.
CloudWatcher
Aug 2024
#20
It'd be difficult because who's providing the "truth"? The jury is not be able to do research.
live love laugh
Jul 2024
#11
I agree with others who say it's probably not logistically possible, but I get your sentiment.
orange jar
Jul 2024
#12
"If a post could be alerted for false info, an area is provided to state why or link to proof"
progree
Jul 2024
#17
Still needs to be addressed, for all the reasons stated. I am quite distressed at the number of times ...
Hekate
Sep 2024
#22
It's a difficult problem to deal with in a forum like this one where people are in basic agreement on so
highplainsdem
Sep 2024
#25
TY, hpd, for a long & thoughtful response. It's going to get more complicated with AI...
Hekate
Sep 2024
#27
I don't know. There have been bots posting on Twitter, even from verified accounts, exposed at times
highplainsdem
Sep 2024
#29
OK. I can see that the jury system can sometimes be faster than moderators quickly responding to
highplainsdem
Sep 2024
#33
Well, no offense, but ironically there's a lot of misinformation in your post that I need to correct
EarlG
Sep 2024
#35
I'm sorry. I hadn't realized it had become that nightmarish a situation for you, Skinner and the mods.
highplainsdem
Sep 2024
#39
I get a good explanation of the alert on every jury I get called to and there are a lot of alerts lately ...
marble falls
Sep 2024
#41
As long as it is demonstrably untrue. Opinions unfortunately are more difficult. And most of politics is opinion.
Silent Type
Sep 2024
#26