Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bernardo de La Paz

(53,052 posts)
2. Best results stem from informative feedback
Sun Dec 10, 2023, 07:45 PM
Dec 2023

1. Feedback to posters who avoid removal: If a poster knows that a post came close to being removed, they will be more careful with future posts. This is a desirable effect.

2. Feedback to jurors: Scurrying over to find a post after it has been voted on is hit or miss. Sometimes the post is gone already, sometimes it is there and ends up removed, sometimes the post is not removed. Most people don't hang around refreshing the page. Feedback helps jurors calibrate their future votes closer to the standards and ratings of other DU members. Creates cohesion and more stability, more consistency. This is a desirable effect for DU.

To keep things simple and small, it can be a banner that appears where the you-have-mail banner appears, after all jurors have voted, perhaps with a link to thread (not post). Format could be simple like: "2 1 -- 3 1 : Post not removed", with the votes to remove ("2 1" ) are in red letters, "removed" also in red if removed, and "Post not removed" in black, perhaps, as with the "--" and the "3 1" (votes to retain).

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Help & Search»DU Community Help»I want to talk about the ...»Reply #2