History of Feminism

JTFrog

(14,274 posts)

37. Oh gee, thanks for your permission.

Fri Apr 15, 2016, 12:08 PM

Apr 2016

Condescending and insulting.

Just go ahead and admit that you are only calling it "cheap" and "pandering" because of your blind hatred for Hillary since the rest of us have already figured that out. If you gave a shit about the issues, you would be happy to see someone bring up the difference between our candidates and the clown car and stress the importance of women's rights and women's reproductive rights and the major impact of appointing a supreme court justice who will uphold roe v. wade to a wide audience. Do you think only Democrats watch these debates? Do you not think that the debates are when these issues should be presented to undecided voters?

I'm now going to just go ahead and put you on ignore, because this isn't the first time that you've baited me and then alerted on my posts.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

54 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Clinton Calls Out Debate Moderators For Ignoring Women’s Health [View all] Little Star Apr 2016 OP

Meh, it was a cheap way to try to pander. revbones Apr 2016 #1

This is a feminist group. We don't consider politicians actually discussing our issues to be JTFrog Apr 2016 #3

Citing their actual positions is trolling? revbones Apr 2016 #4

No your other commentary. You know....she must be pandering since no one else is willing to bring JTFrog Apr 2016 #5

Even the post-debate coverage was remarking on her bringing that up revbones Apr 2016 #6

No I don't think someone actually bringing up women's issues is fucking pandering. JTFrog Apr 2016 #7

While I agree with you, there are a lot of issues that don't get discussed. revbones Apr 2016 #8

I am contacting the hosts now. n/t JTFrog Apr 2016 #9

Hopefully they will read the thread and see your accusations to be false. revbones Apr 2016 #10

I AM FUCKING PISSED ABOUT THE WAR ON WOMEN AND I SHOULD RATCHET IT DOWN!?! JTFrog Apr 2016 #11

Wow revbones Apr 2016 #12

How is being fucking PISSED about women's issues not having a place in the debate UNNECESSARY? JTFrog Apr 2016 #13

Yes, you can do whatever you want. I didn't try to say you couldn't, revbones Apr 2016 #14

NOW IS THE TIME TO YELL. NOT AFTER THE ELECTION. JTFrog Apr 2016 #16

Well, I didn't do that did I? revbones Apr 2016 #17

I am yelling because you are in my safe place. JTFrog Apr 2016 #18

Using women's issues to pander is being insensitive to them. revbones Apr 2016 #19

If you call it pandering, you are absolutely saying something negative about women's issues. JTFrog Apr 2016 #20

Again I think you're more concerned over a slight to Hillary rather than fact. revbones Apr 2016 #21

You know what's in poor taste? JTFrog Apr 2016 #22

Honestly revbones Apr 2016 #23

"This is a safe haven group, for likeminded members. If people don't like it here, they have the, JTFrog Apr 2016 #24

I don't believe that I said anything that violates this group. revbones Apr 2016 #27

How on earth do you not see that calling attention to women's issues "cheap and pandering" is JTFrog Apr 2016 #30

I'm sorry but we obviously disagree on what I said. revbones Apr 2016 #32

I find all of your comments in this thread condescending and insulting. JTFrog Apr 2016 #33

And I find all of your comments here to be antagonistic and insulting. revbones Apr 2016 #34

Quit calling yourself my ally. JTFrog Apr 2016 #35

I wasn't referring to you specifically, but more toward women's rights in general. revbones Apr 2016 #36

Oh gee, thanks for your permission. JTFrog Apr 2016 #37

No, I was just having a discussion revbones Apr 2016 #39

Jury Results Goblinmonger Apr 2016 #38

Thank you for posting the results about that. revbones Apr 2016 #40

From my understanding, it is only on a 0-7 jury Goblinmonger Apr 2016 #41

Ah. Makes sense. revbones Apr 2016 #42

Like your "unnecessary anger" toward Clinton about Wall Street? BainsBane Apr 2016 #43

What anger have I expressed here in this thread? None. revbones Apr 2016 #46

Apparently people can't even be bothered to read the SOP. JTFrog Apr 2016 #48

Amazing how he feels entitled to tell us BainsBane Apr 2016 #49

Completely agree. n/t JTFrog Apr 2016 #50

What the fuck is going on in here? ismnotwasm Apr 2016 #53

Your bias compels you to pretend she panders while Sanders, doing precisely the same thing, LanternWaste Apr 2016 #54

Funny that . . . Gamecock Lefty Apr 2016 #2

Yea, the "pandering" comments are pissing me off. JTFrog Apr 2016 #15

They are thoroughly pissing me off BlueMTexpat Apr 2016 #25

Exactly. n/t JTFrog Apr 2016 #31

always BainsBane Apr 2016 #44

It's about time apcalc Apr 2016 #26

I highly doubt she would admit her willingness to compromise on the right to choose. thereismore Apr 2016 #28

Bernie has dismissed our rights as "a distraction" BainsBane Apr 2016 #45

Of the two people on stage last night only 1 is 100% pro choice the other not so much awake Apr 2016 #29

Sing it loud sister. Good for her. Nt seabeyond Apr 2016 #47

She Did It noretreatnosurrender Apr 2016 #51

K&R ismnotwasm Apr 2016 #52