Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

YarnAddict

(1,850 posts)
25. I checked the PP site
Sat Jan 4, 2014, 05:38 PM
Jan 2014

and BC pills are $15--50/month. I understand that there are some that cost significantly more, but in general, it isn't like some RA drugs, or cancer drugs, where the cost is prohibitive. And for those who can't afford that cost, there are probably some non-profits (maybe including PP?) that will provide those for significantly less.

It's a first amendment thing. While we do have separation of church and state, there is also the free exercise thing. We do make accommodations for individuals' religious observances, such as dietary considerations, footbaths for Muslims, holidays off. If the government is going to start requiring or prohibiting religious organizations and/or individuals to do certain things, where will it end? Who wants to be in the position of having to choose between their job and their religious convictions?

It isn't like the Little Sisters of the Poor is drug testing their employees for birth control pills, and then firing those who test positive. this is something that is against the tenets of their religion, and it seems it is a matter of conscience. The cost of BC is a small thing vs. opening up the First Amendment for reinterpretation depending on the party in charge.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

On this subject, I agree with feminist marxists... Gravitycollapse Jan 2014 #1
thank you for pointing this out niyad Jan 2014 #3
Agreed all around. This stuff really interests (and concerns) me on a deep level. nomorenomore08 Jan 2014 #5
so very, very true niyad Jan 2014 #2
Yup ismnotwasm Jan 2014 #4
Amen and yes, that's 100% true. nt Sarah Ibarruri Jan 2014 #6
yes, and you sound sincere. Tuesday Afternoon Jan 2014 #7
I understand "trust" is difficult for some people, and I try not to take that personally. nomorenomore08 Jan 2014 #9
This message was self-deleted by its author Tuesday Afternoon Jan 2014 #20
I'm gobsmacked that institutions are even *thinking* about giving employers Bette Noir Jan 2014 #8
Well according to Christianity, human beings (women especially) are pretty much God's slaves anyway. nomorenomore08 Jan 2014 #10
The Right Wing believes you sign over ALL of your rights when you trade your services for money... Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2014 #14
They aren't deciding YarnAddict Jan 2014 #23
I don't agree, Yarn. The employers aren't going to pay for the birth control. They are Squinch Jan 2014 #24
I checked the PP site YarnAddict Jan 2014 #25
But why do one person's beliefs trump another person's beliefs? Squinch Jan 2014 #26
Imposing religious doctrine on health plans *does* violate church-state separation. Absolutely right nomorenomore08 Jan 2014 #30
I think the thing that bothers me about this is that Obama came up with a reasonable, good-faith Squinch Jan 2014 #31
Except birth control is a basic part of health care. And if it isn't, then why should Viagra or nomorenomore08 Jan 2014 #29
In such a society, women's healthcare would be considered geek tragedy Jan 2014 #11
What a different world it would be, if only... freshwest Jan 2014 #12
You would be surprised to find out how many women believe it already passed. Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2014 #15
Since I was campaigning for it and the voting age amendment, I paid attention. Some thought that freshwest Jan 2014 #16
The usual suspects.... Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2014 #18
Just heard someone tonight say, "If a woman is out to HERE though..." Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2014 #13
Bet it's all crickets by then, huh? n/t freshwest Jan 2014 #17
The usual: They claim they speak for God and that is supposed to win the day. Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2014 #19
Here is a new and different question to ask those who speak for God: truedelphi Jan 2014 #27
Hell, some of these people are too dumb to follow that. They think the Jews worship Jesus too. Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2014 #28
A big reason the anti choice nuts are more sufrommich Jan 2014 #21
There really IS this puritanical crap linking sex with morality. Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2014 #22
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»If we actually lived in a...»Reply #25