Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Occupy Underground

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)

2. It could be. But that vote, against subsidies for the Too Big To Fail Banks, is non-binding. So if

Reply to Blanks (Reply #1)

Mon Mar 25, 2013, 05:48 PM

Mar 2013

they voted this way because of the report, from what I'm reading, it doesn't really mean much. Most of the articles I've read say that there is no chance at all of Congress ever breaking up the Big Banks.

I'll see if I can find some of the articles on what it means.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

'Jamie Dimon Agrees With Occupy Wall Street: 'Too Much Inequality' [View all] sabrina 1 Mar 2013 OP

Is this why the senate voted unanimously against TBTF? eom Blanks Mar 2013 #1

It could be. But that vote, against subsidies for the Too Big To Fail Banks, is non-binding. So if sabrina 1 Mar 2013 #2

Too much inequality. hay rick Mar 2013 #3

'too much inequality describes the situation in which the parasite kills the host.' sabrina 1 Mar 2013 #4