Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Fire Walk With Me

(38,893 posts)
2. But the collapse did not hurt the very rich. It -did- set the stage for them to steal massive
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 06:21 PM
Mar 2013

amounts of money since that time, and they have. Remember that the top 20% of the rich in the US, UK, and Canada are the "actual" economy; there is no "the consumer" according to the Citigroup "Plutonomy" memo. They may insulate themselves from economic difficulty and take advantage of us as we thrash about. For example, again from the memo, equities are the main asset of the very rich, with housing investments being that of the bottom 80%. I'm no economist but as far as I can tell, the housing bubble and subsequent land grab only enrich the rich and cause them no pain.

Scattered analysis of the Citigroup "Plutonomy" memo:
http://occupyobservations.blogspot.com/2013/02/the-leaked-2006-citigroup-plutonomy-memo.html

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Occupy Underground»Three waves of revolt: Wh...»Reply #2