Occupy Underground

All the nominees (self or otherwise) for co-hosts would be put in an alphabetical list and submitted to poll... the lead host would appoint the top vote getter, then the lead host would appoint the second vote getter, then the lead host would appoint the third vote getter, etc. The primary function of lead host would be to serve as vibes watcher. (given the built-in nature of the position is inherent in the system!1¡)

There's something to be said for no hosts being more in the tradition of Occupy, but the question is can we do hosts and have them exist primarily to encourage GA-like structures? I.e. Occupy does have (community created, consensus driven) guidelines. We could create "non-hosting" guidelines (that also dictate the limits that would be put on appointing future hosts) by consensus, if we want to be really unique.