Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Garrett78

(10,721 posts)
4. Because it's not about economic messaging.
Sun Nov 27, 2016, 06:29 PM
Nov 2016

If it was, Democrats would dominate. Clinton and others put forth substantive positions on economics, while Trump makes vague and meaningless remarks.

It's partly the messenger. There can be no doubt that Clinton was victimized by decades of hate (much of it completely irrational and rooted in sexism).

But it's primarily a cultural/social matter. Racism, sexism, xenophobia, heterosexism and Christian supremacy takes precedence for tens of millions of people.

Attempting to reach some of those who never vote would be a much more productive use of time than attempting to reach those who live in an alternate reality.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Will economic populism le...»Reply #4