Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

(2,116 posts)

9. random testing of machines is not sufficient. we need all hand-counted paper ballots. it has been d

Sun Nov 27, 2016, 04:50 AM

Nov 2016

done for centuries. there is no reason that computers or machines need to be involved at all.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

20 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Should have a standard voting system within the United States [View all] UCmeNdc Nov 2016 OP

I agree that all voting methods should have a proper audit trail... TreasonousBastard Nov 2016 #1

A less personal, but far more common example to me... Wounded Bear Nov 2016 #7

I'm was a poll worker in NJ. no_hypocrisy Nov 2016 #2

There is no sane reason for that BSdetect Nov 2016 #4

I agree with your assessment except UCmeNdc Nov 2016 #6

that will take a constitutional amendment Grey Lemercier Nov 2016 #8

That's fascinating. I'll have to come back to read up on it later. Hekate Nov 2016 #11

I agree that changing the size of the House would be a better way SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2016 #13

yep, thats the Wyoming Rule I listed. I think its better than nothing Grey Lemercier Nov 2016 #15

K&R BSdetect Nov 2016 #12

I agree PatSeg Nov 2016 #14

The farce of Bush v. Gore Danmel Nov 2016 #16

Three times, probably DFW Nov 2016 #20

it may take something like that. nt TheFrenchRazor Nov 2016 #19