Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PoindexterOglethorpe

(27,684 posts)
6. While it does seem as though pretty much every single star out there
Mon Jun 19, 2023, 12:53 AM
Jun 2023

has planets (My Son The Astronomer does exo-planet research), it's important to realize that the conditions that actually lead to life of any kind are probably very rare.

First off, some 70% of stars are red dwarfs, so if life evolves on planets around a red dwarf, it's probably going to be very different from our life. Only about 7-8% of the stars in our galaxy are like the sun.

There's also a Goldilocks zone for stars, just as there's a Goldilocks zone for planets. Get close to the center of the galaxy and stars are so close together that radiation is a huge problem, and would probably prevent life at all. Too far out may likewise not be so good either.

It also may well be that having a relatively large moon, as we do, is absolutely crucial. It gives us the tides, which probably had a positive influence on life.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Skepticism, Science & Pseudoscience»Carl Sagan 1966 Interview...»Reply #6