Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

nuxvomica

(14,268 posts)
9. Yes, they are very naturalistic
Fri May 29, 2026, 10:05 PM
Friday

Unlike later cultures, like the Egyptians, Indians, Chinese, Early Greeks, Africans, etc. whose art became stylized, so much so that we tend to think of "primitive" and "ancient" artists as lacking skill, but that's only because earlier cultures imposed societal norms and symbolism on their art, especially if they developed formal art instruction. Naturalism was sort of "rediscovered" by the Greeks and Romans, and again in the Renaissance, and once again with photography. But there has always been this tendency to distort the natural world in art. I suspect prehistoric artists were less encumbered by such cultural baggage so the beasts are still recognizable to us today.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Anthropology»Scientists Opened a Seale...»Reply #9