Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

(49,533 posts)

18. No need to get snarky.

Mon Apr 1, 2019, 08:01 AM

Apr 2019

I am well aware of the role of judges in interpreting the law.

I am also well aware of religious privilege and the problems it causes.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

19 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Quebec to ban public employees from wearing religious symbols [View all] Eugene Mar 2019 OP

Hmmm greymattermom Mar 2019 #1

Well, wigs aren't exclusively a religious symbol. Mariana Mar 2019 #2

Except the law obviously targets edhopper Mar 2019 #15

Sacrebleu! MineralMan Mar 2019 #3

D'accord. guillaumeb Mar 2019 #13

"legitimise discrimination against citizens based on their religion" trotsky Mar 2019 #4

In the US, we have separation of church and state marylandblue Mar 2019 #5

So if a Christian wore a Westboro Baptist style shirt... trotsky Mar 2019 #7

IMO that would cross the line into proselytizing, so not okay. marylandblue Mar 2019 #9

"IMO" being the key words. trotsky Apr 2019 #16

We have people who render these opinions professionally marylandblue Apr 2019 #17

No need to get snarky. trotsky Apr 2019 #18

Sorry, sometimes my humor falls flat. No offense intended. marylandblue Apr 2019 #19

The frank truth is that some things really aren't that offensive, some are. Pope George Ringo II Mar 2019 #11

...or a Jewish skullcap. They've tried that too. Eugene Mar 2019 #6

One of those things is religious discrimination, one isn't Major Nikon Mar 2019 #14

The CAQ Party is very far right. guillaumeb Mar 2019 #12