Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brush

(58,304 posts)
3. Wasn't the runner supposed to be on the other side of the baseline?
Wed Oct 30, 2019, 04:46 PM
Oct 2019

Why was it such a big controversy?

You're coached as a player in that situation to if it's going to be close to throw at the runner in hopes of getting the call from the ump. That's what happened—runner interference, which wouldn't have been called had the runner been on the other side of the baseline.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Baseball»The Great World Series In...»Reply #3