Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Fiction

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Little Star

(17,055 posts)
Fri Nov 16, 2012, 09:37 AM Nov 2012

E-reading isn’t reading....... [View all]

Interesting article in Slate.

Out of Touch
E-reading isn’t reading.
Slate.com
By Andrew Piper Thursday, Nov. 15, 2012


However much electronic books may try to look like their printed brethren, they still change how we manually interact with them and those changes matter for how we read. There are, for starters, no longer any pages to turn. There is no density to the e-book (all is battery), which is incidentally one of its greatest selling points. Open books can be measured by the sliding scale of pages past and future, like steps, just off to the side of the page. What lies after the digital page? An abyss. No matter what the page number says (and depending on which screen you’re reading it will say different things), we have no way to corroborate this evidence with our senses, no idea where we are while we read. Instead of turning the page, we now have the button, at least for a little while longer. The hand no longer points, and thus cognitively and emotionally reaches for something it cannot have (like Michelangelo’s famous finger), it presses or squeezes. The mechanical pressure that gave birth to the printed book in the form of the wooden handpress is today both vastly reduced in scale and multiplied in number through our interactions with the digital. There is a punctuatedness, a suddenness, but also a repetitiveness to pressing buttons that starkly contrast with the sedate rhythms of the slowly turned page. Buttons convert human motion into an electrical effect. In this, they preserve the idea of “conversion” that was at the core of reading books for Augustine. But in their incessant repetitiveness the meaning of conversion is gradually hollowed out. It is made less transformative.


Buttons also resist. Over time, their use causes stress to the human body, known as carpal tunnel syndrome. Like its related postural malady, “text neck,” these syndromes are signs of how computation is beginning to stretch us, both cognitively and corporally. The resistance of the button is an intimation of the way technology increasingly seems to be pushing back.


Perhaps it is for this reason that we are moving away from the world of the button to that of the touch screen. From the ugly three-dimensionality of the mechanical apparatus we ascend to the fantasy of existing in only two dimensions, a world of the single, yet infinite page. Here the finger no longer converts, but conducts. With capacitive touch screens your finger alters the screen’s electrostatic field thereby conveying a command. Instead of pressing to turn the page, we now swipe. Kinesthesia, the sense of bodily movement, overrides the book’s synesthesia, its unique art of conjoining touch, sight, and thought into a unified experience. In an electronic environment, corporal action overtakes reading’s traditional inaction.


http://www.slate.com/articles/arts/culturebox/2012/11/reading_on_a_kindle_is_not_the_same_as_reading_a_book.single.html


I have to admit that I much prefer reading a book than I do reading on my Kindle. I like my Kindle for travel but at home I much prefer a book. A book is comforting.

What about you guys?
58 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
E-reading isn’t reading....... [View all] Little Star Nov 2012 OP
I much prefer reading on my kindle than reading a real book. Skinner Nov 2012 #1
In my life there is room for both.... Little Star Nov 2012 #2
Well, I've been reading books for over 60 years, so of course... TreasonousBastard Nov 2012 #3
This message was self-deleted by its author antiquie Nov 2012 #4
Reading has fuck all to do with your fingers. dmallind Nov 2012 #5
I strongly disagree mythology Dec 2012 #40
Tortured analogy at best dmallind Jan 2013 #44
I like both Lydia Leftcoast Nov 2012 #6
And then there's this: print vs. eBooks for kids.. Little Star Nov 2012 #7
I didn't read the whole piece jp11 Nov 2012 #8
One of the things I like a great deal about traditional books is that SheilaT Nov 2012 #9
I have to admit that I have not tried e-reading, Curmudgeoness Nov 2012 #10
Me neither & me too.... fadedrose Nov 2012 #12
Yes. One huge drawback to the ereaders is that SheilaT Nov 2012 #20
I had never thought of formatting changes, Curmudgeoness Nov 2012 #21
You should be thinking about it. SheilaT Nov 2012 #22
I'll give you long term power failure getting old in mke Nov 2012 #23
Thank you for that information. SheilaT Nov 2012 #24
DRM = Digital Rights Management getting old in mke Nov 2012 #25
You know, it might be amusing to get library books signed. SheilaT Nov 2012 #26
WOW! Yes! getting old in mke Nov 2012 #27
Of course you can. An e-book is just a computer file. dmallind Jan 2013 #45
I do about 1/3 + 1/3 + 1/3 getting old in mke Nov 2012 #11
Oh, I forgot about audio books.... Little Star Nov 2012 #13
I am far more comfortable reading my Kindle than a regular book. Lex Nov 2012 #14
Why would we have to choose? CaliforniaHiker Nov 2012 #15
Here's something else to consider. SheilaT Nov 2012 #16
However you were able to get to the digitized version of the Life magazines Lex Nov 2012 #28
Admittedly, I wasn't looking that hard. SheilaT Nov 2012 #29
Does e-reading serve any real purpose? Jim__ Nov 2012 #17
I love books - I love how they feel, making a crease in their spines, closeupready Nov 2012 #18
I love my NOOK Mz Pip Nov 2012 #19
I like the Kindle for stuff not available in print pscot Nov 2012 #30
I'm in my 40's, and I love my Nook DisgustipatedinCA Dec 2012 #31
Another problem with an ereader is going SheilaT Dec 2012 #32
Or quickly turning pages to see if a specific character will appear again.. fadedrose Dec 2012 #33
Smiley face here. SheilaT Dec 2012 #34
Thanks for the link to the MJ article. Loss of privacy should enter into the conversation. Little Star Dec 2012 #35
Interesting article getting old in mke Dec 2012 #36
The claim is made that our government is continually SheilaT Dec 2012 #37
David Brin on Transparency getting old in mke Dec 2012 #38
Will e-readers eventually have a negative effect on public libraries? Little Star Dec 2012 #39
I prefer reading a book Xyzse Dec 2012 #41
I don't have an e-reader, but whenever i am reading SheilaT Jan 2013 #42
I can understand that Xyzse Jan 2013 #43
After going through 4 surgeries on my left eye during 2012, you can believe how japple Jan 2013 #46
To Each Their Own. However...... Paladin Jan 2013 #47
Has anyone read a e-book with audio/video capability?... Little Star Jan 2013 #48
There have been children's books from B&N getting old in mke Jan 2013 #49
I discovered yesterday the Amazon Kindle app for smart phones. closeupready Jan 2013 #50
lol! I want to marry the internet because everyday I learn something new on these tubes. n/t Little Star Jan 2013 #51
I have a number of readers on my devices getting old in mke Jan 2013 #52
That's why I always have a book or two with me. SheilaT Jan 2013 #54
Well, my 8-tracks weren't computer files... getting old in mke Jan 2013 #55
There are some downsides to ereaders that are totally overlooked. SheilaT Jan 2013 #56
Nope, not a downside. getting old in mke Jan 2013 #57
I love my e-readers gollygee Jan 2013 #53
There's plenty of room for both. LWolf Jan 2013 #58
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Fiction»E-reading isn’t reading.....»Reply #0