Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Seniors

(138,751 posts)

6. THANKS!

Wed Aug 4, 2021, 01:42 PM

Aug 2021

Been trying to 'retrieve' that term. Sure sounds 'open, visible, and notorious,' to me, so what's with 'civil contempt???'

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

+1 peppertree Aug 2021 #3

Can't Be Called A Squatter...As He's Lived There Nearly Thirty Years wyn borkins Aug 2021 #2

This sounds like a pretty good case of adverse possession. rsdsharp Aug 2021 #4

THANKS! elleng Aug 2021 #6

The only thing I can think is that New Hampshire doesn't rsdsharp Aug 2021 #7

Makes 'sense,' in that respect. elleng Aug 2021 #8

He claims he had permission Effete Snob Aug 2021 #10

It's not adverse at all Effete Snob Aug 2021 #9

'jailed since July 15 on a civil contempt sanction.' elleng Aug 2021 #5

Why all the praise for a squatter? PoindexterOglethorpe Aug 2021 #11

For crissakes XanaDUer2 Aug 2021 #12