Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

zipplewrath

(16,692 posts)
3. Not quite
Tue Oct 22, 2013, 11:13 AM
Oct 2013

They do pretty well, but like so many, they let the hyperbole get to themselves.

Its weapons makers are the most advanced on Earth and dominate the global arms market.
...
Its system of spy satellites is unsurpassed and unchallenged.


There are two dominant arms markets. Western arms, which we dominate for sure, and then there is the whole China/Russia/N.Korea market place (with additional actors) that basically serveces anyone we won't. Syria right now is accessing that other market through Russia. And there is a private market that ultimately services markets out of Western Europe (frequently Germany).

And our satellite system is threatened by recently developed systems of China. It is rapidly becoming an assumption that in any battle with China, we would lose much of our GPS capability straight away. Europe is also working on their own GPS constellation as well.

We spend our defense dollars stupidly, and we utilze that capability even worse. We could and should spend vastly less, and use it vastly less as well.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Veterans»Why Washington Just Can’t...»Reply #3