Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Eugene

(62,816 posts)
Tue Dec 18, 2018, 01:22 PM Dec 2018

Pittsburgh considers stricter gun laws after synagogue attack [View all]

Source: Reuters

POLITICS DECEMBER 18, 2018 / 9:40 AM / UPDATED 36 MINUTES AGO

Pittsburgh considers stricter gun laws after synagogue attack

Gabriella Borter
2 MIN READ

(Reuters) - The Pittsburgh City Council began considering a package of gun-control laws on Tuesday, including a ban on assault-style rifles, nearly two months after a gunman shouting anti-Semitic messages killed 11 people in a synagogue.

The measure would also ban certain types of ammunition and allow courts to ban gun ownership by people deemed to pose a significant threat of violence.

Seven of nine council members agreed to co-sponsor the legislation at Tuesday’s meeting.

“As gun violence escalates across the country, it would be unconscionable for me to stand by and do nothing,” Councilman Corey O’Connor, one of the legislation’s authors, said in a statement. O’Connor represents Squirrel Hill, the neighborhood where the massacre at the Tree of Life synagogue took place.

-snip-


Read more: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-pennsylvania-shooting/pittsburgh-considers-stricter-gun-laws-after-synagogue-attack-idUSKBN1OH1JU
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Not City Level gunsmoker Dec 2018 #1
Two Critical Factors gunsmoker Dec 2018 #2
Another question, gejohnston Dec 2018 #3
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Pittsburgh considers stri...»Reply #0