Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: A question for this group-- [View all]Straw Man
(6,799 posts)62. A few more things.
A gun present seems to increase the odds of being killed by a gun.
Yes. It is impossible to be killed by a gun when there is no gun present. Does that really need to be said? It's a meaningless truism.
So--don't carry a fucking gun in my presence. Your(not YOU you) right to carry takes years off of my life(on average).
Umm ... no, it doesn't. You are not a statistical amalgam, and merely being in the presence of a gun does nothing to your personal life expectancy.
Gun nuts are called gun nuts for a reason. It is their biggest thing. The fact that it is their biggest thing makes them the perfect candidates for not being able to carry guns.
I'm sorry, but that's complete nonsense. It's the type of Catch-22 mumbo-jumbo that gun-haters use to try to make their case for total disarmament. I own a modest collection of guns. I use guns recreationally and frequently carry one for self-defense. You would probably call me a "gun nut," but guns are not my "biggest thing." My loved ones are my "biggest thing," and my second-biggest thing is music. Most of the people I shoot with have similar value systems. You are operating with a set of blinkered stereotypes that distort your perceptions.
And--the studies that are actually available show that having a gun on your person changes how you react to certain situations. OF COURSE it does. Of course it does. The biggest tool you have changes how one reacts.
Perhaps, but not necessarily in the way that you think it does. For example, I have a friend who was a bad road-rager until he got his CCW and started to carry a handgun. At that point, he realized the potentially dire consequences of getting into these idiotic conflicts and mended his ways accordingly. "Let it go" became his mantra.
Your opinion of your fellow human being seems to be curiously low for someone on a progressive website.
Finally-I have personally chosen to react to a few people differently based upon the likelihood that they probably have a gun.
This is a problem--it means that the normal social reward or opprobrium is missing.
This is a problem--it means that the normal social reward or opprobrium is missing.
Yes, it is a problem, and it's strictly your problem. Unless someone is actually threatening you with a gun, there is no reason for these fears.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
98 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
By "control"-I was referring to a person's feeling of being personally in control--
digonswine
Apr 2018
#29
It's silly to take the founding fathers' ideas as perfect for today's problems-
digonswine
Jun 2018
#93
re: I have had enough of it and am probably done discussing it(maybe).
discntnt_irny_srcsm
Jun 2018
#97
Why are there no warnings on guns that say you are more likely to be killed with a gun when you poss
gejohnston
May 2018
#64
Carrying for self-defense generally means being able to draw and shoot quickly.
krispos42
Apr 2018
#15
"...the right to "have arms" embodied in the English Declaration of Rights...
discntnt_irny_srcsm
Apr 2018
#40
re you saying there should be limits regarding who carries what? Sure seems that way.
digonswine
May 2018
#84