Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
Showing Original Post only (View all)What America's gun fanatics won't tell you [View all]
The Second Amendment doesnt give you the right to own a gun
Can we please stop pretending that the Second Amendment contains an unfettered right for everyone to buy a gun? It doesnt, and it never has. The claims made by the small number of extremists, before and after the Orlando, Fla., massacre, are based on a deliberate lie.
The Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution doesnt just say Congress shall not infringe the right to keep and bear arms. It specifically says that right exists in order to maintain a well-regulated militia. Even the late conservative Supreme Court Associate Justice Antonin Scalia admitted those words werent in there by accident. Oh, and the Constitution doesnt just say a militia. It says a well-regulated militia.
What did the Founding Fathers mean by that? We dont have to guess because they told us. In Federalist No. 29 of the Federalist Papers, Alexander Hamilton explained at great length precisely what a well-regulated militia was, why the Founding Fathers thought we needed one, and why they wanted to protect it from being disarmed by the federal government.
The Second Amendment is an instrument of government. Its not about hunting or gun collecting or carrying your pistol into the saloon.
And theres a reason absolutely no gun extremist will ever direct you to that 1788 essay because it blows their baloney into a million pieces.
A well-regulated militia didnt mean guys who read Soldier of Fortune magazine running around in the woods with AK-47s and warpaint on their faces. It basically meant what today we call the National Guard.
<snip>
But even if you still want to defend the Second Amendment, it should apply only to those who volunteer to join the select corps of their National Guard, undergo rigorous training to attain proficiency in military functions and perform the operations of an army, serve as ordered under the ultimate command of the president and be subject to military discipline.
So if youre running around waving your AK-47 under the Second Amendment, and you havent shown up yet at your local National Guard headquarters, youre not a patriot. Youre a deserter. - Marketwatch
Can we please stop pretending that the Second Amendment contains an unfettered right for everyone to buy a gun? It doesnt, and it never has. The claims made by the small number of extremists, before and after the Orlando, Fla., massacre, are based on a deliberate lie.
The Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution doesnt just say Congress shall not infringe the right to keep and bear arms. It specifically says that right exists in order to maintain a well-regulated militia. Even the late conservative Supreme Court Associate Justice Antonin Scalia admitted those words werent in there by accident. Oh, and the Constitution doesnt just say a militia. It says a well-regulated militia.
What did the Founding Fathers mean by that? We dont have to guess because they told us. In Federalist No. 29 of the Federalist Papers, Alexander Hamilton explained at great length precisely what a well-regulated militia was, why the Founding Fathers thought we needed one, and why they wanted to protect it from being disarmed by the federal government.
The Second Amendment is an instrument of government. Its not about hunting or gun collecting or carrying your pistol into the saloon.
And theres a reason absolutely no gun extremist will ever direct you to that 1788 essay because it blows their baloney into a million pieces.
A well-regulated militia didnt mean guys who read Soldier of Fortune magazine running around in the woods with AK-47s and warpaint on their faces. It basically meant what today we call the National Guard.
<snip>
But even if you still want to defend the Second Amendment, it should apply only to those who volunteer to join the select corps of their National Guard, undergo rigorous training to attain proficiency in military functions and perform the operations of an army, serve as ordered under the ultimate command of the president and be subject to military discipline.
So if youre running around waving your AK-47 under the Second Amendment, and you havent shown up yet at your local National Guard headquarters, youre not a patriot. Youre a deserter. - Marketwatch
71 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is that your only conclusion to the OP-ED after reading Alexander Hamilton's Federalist Paper 29?
ffr
Mar 2018
#2
I'm sorry, but you just made a straw man fallacy. I have offered no proposition at this point
ffr
Mar 2018
#4
"When you reply to a sourced article posted on D.U., you are replying to that sourced article."
Eko
Mar 2018
#46
That's a given. Articles are referenced sometimes at the top for LBN, but usually at the bottom.
ffr
Mar 2018
#55
You don't really think those assholes CARE what the constitution says, do you?
Ferrets are Cool
Mar 2018
#52
You forget that the findings in Miller were rendered moot by Heller. The same standard applies...
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2018
#69