Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,602 posts)
23. Not to intrude here but #9 is not your post
Fri Mar 16, 2018, 08:00 PM
Mar 2018

You are the one who asserted that 600,000 students would walk out.
You are the one who asserted that millions of others would join those students.

It is up to those making assertions to offer some verification when questioned. I work in a formal regulated environment where verification is taken seriously. The means of verification are practically limited to analysis here.

Further, in #13 you imply that Marengo needs to prove that what you asserted didn't happen. You must realize that proving a negative is impossible.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

When 600,000 students and countless millions of others walk out tomorrow at 10:00 AM ffr Mar 2018 #1
no it isn't gejohnston Mar 2018 #3
That flies in the face of everything I'm seeing and hearing on the news. ffr Mar 2018 #4
they are a loud minority gejohnston Mar 2018 #6
Did countless millions and 600,000 students walk out yesterday as you predicted? If not, exactly... Marengo Mar 2018 #9
I was wrong. It wasn't 600,000 students, it was a 1,000,000 give or take. ffr Mar 2018 #11
i dont see any reference to countless millions in that article, neither is there a source... Marengo Mar 2018 #12
Unusually negative conclusion for something that would be difficult to quantify ffr Mar 2018 #13
Are you claiming youre not wrong on predicting countless millions would walk out? Marengo Mar 2018 #14
Nice Red Herring fallacy, but please address my previous proposition Post #9 ffr Mar 2018 #15
Ummm, you made the claim countless millions would walk out. Where is the evidence this happened? Marengo Mar 2018 #17
Another Red Herring diversion. Address my proposition in #9. ffr Mar 2018 #18
Ah, so no evidence then. Got it. Marengo Mar 2018 #19
I can't move on to address your next question until you've rebutted my 1st. ffr Mar 2018 #21
Not to intrude here but #9 is not your post discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2018 #23
I see it's now post #11, the one that he replied to. But I rebut your straw man conclusion. ffr Mar 2018 #24
Thanks for the belated welcome and welcome to you too discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2018 #25
A B C ffr Mar 2018 #29
A B C 1 2 3... discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2018 #32
Youre right, you cant move on as you have nothing to back the prediction countless millions Marengo Mar 2018 #28
Do you think it's ridiculous of me to ask that you provide basis for your rebuttal? ffr Mar 2018 #30
LOL! Just as I expected. Im still waiting for a source proving your prediction that countless... Marengo Mar 2018 #33
Whoops. See my post below. It didn't reply to this post directly. n/t ffr Mar 2018 #31
p.s. Welcome to D.U. ffr Mar 2018 #16
In limbo-- where it's been for years... TreasonousBastard Mar 2018 #2
In the larger context, gejohnston Mar 2018 #5
I think you've revealed more about yourself than you intended, on this thread. Paladin Mar 2018 #7
Two things, gejohnston Mar 2018 #8
What has been revealed? Marengo Mar 2018 #10
I think you've revealed more about yourself than you intended, with that post friendly_iconoclast Mar 2018 #20
In the shitter? Alea Mar 2018 #22
what is said and done during a campaign usually doesn't lead to same policies once in office beachbum bob Mar 2018 #26
Lamb favored stricter background checks Freddie Mar 2018 #27
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»A pro-gun Democrat could ...»Reply #23