Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: A revolver on its own would have been inadequate. [View all]tazkcmo
(7,419 posts)As opposed to just surviving the encounter (And I agree the perp's death greatly increases the odds of surviving) then hell yes! Hell, get 2 of them and pump 200 rounds at the perp and to hell with the stray bullets that miss him! WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE HOOOOOOOO!!!!!
Also, if one is ok with children getting the same treatment then by all means, support even looser gun control. Hell, Stinger missiles and claymore mines all around! What's the death of of 2000 ( https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2018/2/23/17044810/guns-killing-high-school-kids-alarming-rates ) kids a year when compared to the power rush of spraying 100 bullets in a few seconds and turning what ever you're shooting into hamburger?
Put it this way. If I have to choose between to my child's life and the 2nd amendment, I choose my child. Others are free to value the caress of a semi-automatic more than a hug from their child but damned if I'll let anyone minimize MY child's life so they can hump a semi. Opposing a ban on military grade weaponry, semi or auto, is valuing guns over children and I find it selfish and sickening.
You asked for responses and even tossed in a free insult as incentive. I won't return the insult but being inconvenienced so less children die at school seems a small price to pay. You apparently disagree but I guess all of your children are alive.