Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

melm00se

(5,087 posts)
20. 18th century muskets
Tue Jun 20, 2017, 08:30 AM
Jun 2017

(this is all my opinion borne out of having shot multiple flintlock muskets over the years of 18th century design).

Military muskets (Brown Bess/Charleville) were heavy (~10.5 pounds), poorly balanced (very muzzle heavy even without the affixed bayonet) and inaccurate due to the musket balls being undersized compared the bore which made for faster reloading and less fouling) but their construction made them more rugged.

A colonial civilian, on the other hand, had what was referred to as a "fowler". It was a tad longer, lighter weight (~8 pounds), better balanced and more accurate due to tighter tolerance between the size of the ball and the size of the bore. It's downsides, it was slower to reload (harder to ram the ball home) and not nearly as rugged as its military counterpart.

So the argument can be made the civilian weapons of the War of Independence era were "better" than their military counterparts.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It gets me wondering when your post is simply obfuscation... pbmus Jun 2017 #1
That still doesn't explain how you get from needledriver Jun 2017 #4
I am sure you are familiar with the word, modification.. pbmus Jun 2017 #5
And the number of bump fire stocks used in public shooting is...? needledriver Jun 2017 #7
Only you are talking about something only the FBI or local police would know? pbmus Jun 2017 #8
You have obviously ignored needledriver Jun 2017 #9
So you are concerned about the fact that the guns used by pbmus Jun 2017 #10
It's good that you recognize your limitations, and are thus withdrawing from the debate friendly_iconoclast Jun 2017 #12
My expertise is psychology and I do know that I had reached the end pbmus Jun 2017 #16
My rec brought it up to 157..n/t monmouth4 Jun 2017 #2
There is a point you are missing. Eko Jun 2017 #3
That video is just adorable needledriver Jun 2017 #6
1st off Eko Jun 2017 #11
Why, yes, there is... tortoise1956 Jun 2017 #13
Why yes. Eko Jun 2017 #14
Very civil response, tortoise1956 Jun 2017 #15
Thanks, Eko Jun 2017 #17
My pleasure, it's a very welcome change tortoise1956 Jun 2017 #19
You had a great point ("the people" vs "those Enrolled"). A good catch. jmg257 Jun 2017 #21
another point discntnt_irny_srcsm Jun 2017 #22
18th century muskets melm00se Jun 2017 #20
Of course this is innaccurate - Accuracy is only important to shooters. Nt The Polack MSgt Jun 2017 #18
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Is anyone else here enjoy...»Reply #20