Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

tortoise1956

(671 posts)
19. My pleasure, it's a very welcome change
Tue Jun 20, 2017, 01:45 AM
Jun 2017

If you are still interested in this subject, I suggest you look at 18th and early 19th century sources and documents for a sense of the public attitudes and beliefs. To me, that is the best way to attempt to determine original intent.

I have to say up front I have never found anything that absolutely, without a doubt, proves the purpose of the second amendment was to ensure that the right to keep and bear arms was a right of every American, for both personal defense and to prevent a tyrannical government from usurping the power they had just wrested from British hands. I reached that opinion after many hours of research, going back all the way to Blackstone's writings form 17th century England. However, as they say, YMMV... You may have a completely different opinion, or you may not.

In any event, you took the time to follow up and check for yourself, and that's all I ever ask of those who disagree with me.

Have a happy!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It gets me wondering when your post is simply obfuscation... pbmus Jun 2017 #1
That still doesn't explain how you get from needledriver Jun 2017 #4
I am sure you are familiar with the word, modification.. pbmus Jun 2017 #5
And the number of bump fire stocks used in public shooting is...? needledriver Jun 2017 #7
Only you are talking about something only the FBI or local police would know? pbmus Jun 2017 #8
You have obviously ignored needledriver Jun 2017 #9
So you are concerned about the fact that the guns used by pbmus Jun 2017 #10
It's good that you recognize your limitations, and are thus withdrawing from the debate friendly_iconoclast Jun 2017 #12
My expertise is psychology and I do know that I had reached the end pbmus Jun 2017 #16
My rec brought it up to 157..n/t monmouth4 Jun 2017 #2
There is a point you are missing. Eko Jun 2017 #3
That video is just adorable needledriver Jun 2017 #6
1st off Eko Jun 2017 #11
Why, yes, there is... tortoise1956 Jun 2017 #13
Why yes. Eko Jun 2017 #14
Very civil response, tortoise1956 Jun 2017 #15
Thanks, Eko Jun 2017 #17
My pleasure, it's a very welcome change tortoise1956 Jun 2017 #19
You had a great point ("the people" vs "those Enrolled"). A good catch. jmg257 Jun 2017 #21
another point discntnt_irny_srcsm Jun 2017 #22
18th century muskets melm00se Jun 2017 #20
Of course this is innaccurate - Accuracy is only important to shooters. Nt The Polack MSgt Jun 2017 #18
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Is anyone else here enjoy...»Reply #19