Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jmg257

(11,996 posts)
37. Here's the actual "Enforcement Notice"
Fri Jul 22, 2016, 07:41 AM
Jul 2016
http://www.mass.gov/ago/public-safety/awbe.html

“Assault weapon” is defined as a:
{Section 121 Background}
The sale, transfer, or possession of an “Assault weapon,” as defined in Section 121, is unlawful pursuant to G.L. c. 140, §§ 128 and 131M.

“Assault weapon” is defined as a:

semiautomatic assault weapon as defined in the federal Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act, 18 U.S.C. section 921(a)(30) as appearing in such section on September 13, 1994, and shall include, but not be limited to, any of the weapons, or copies or duplicates of the weapons {emphasis added}, of any caliber, known as:
i Avtomat Kalashnikov (AK) (all models);
Action Arms Israeli Military Industries UZI and Galil;
Beretta Ar70 (SC-70);
Colt AR-15;
Fabrique National FN/FAL, FN/LAR and FNC;
SWD M-10, M-11, M-11/9 and M-12;
Steyr AUG;
INTRATEC TEC-9, TEC-DC9 and TEC-22; and
revolving cylinder shotguns, such as, or similar to, the Street Sweeper and Striker 12;
...
Section 121 incorporates by reference the definition of “semiautomatic assault weapon” in the former federal assault weapons ban. This establishes that in Massachusetts weapons with the following characteristics are also within the definition of Assault weapon:

18 U.S.C. section 921(a) (30) as appearing in such section on September 13, 1994:

B) a semiautomatic rifle that has an ability to accept a detachable magazine and has at least 2 of—
{typical 2 feature test}
...

Guidance:

A weapon is a Copy or Duplicate and is therefore a prohibited Assault weapon if it meets one or both of the following tests and is 1) a semiautomatic rifle or handgun that was manufactured or subsequently configured with an ability to accept a detachable magazine, or 2) a semiautomatic shotgun.

Similarity Test: A weapon is a Copy or Duplicate if its internal functional components are substantially similar in construction and configuration to those of an Enumerated Weapon. Under this test, a weapon is a Copy or Duplicate, for example, if the operating system and firing mechanism of the weapon are based on or otherwise substantially similar to one of the Enumerated Weapons.

Interchangeability Test: A weapon is a Copy or Duplicate if it has a receiver that is the same as or interchangeable with the receiver of an Enumerated Weapon. A receiver will be treated as the same as or interchangeable with the receiver on an Enumerated Weapon if it includes or accepts two or more operating components that are the same as or interchangeable with those of an Enumerated Weapon. Such operating components may include, but are not limited to: 1) the trigger assembly; 2) the bolt carrier or bolt carrier group; 3) the charging handle; 4) the extractor or extractor assembly; or 5) the magazine port.

If a weapon meets one of the above tests, it is a Copy or Duplicate (and therefore a prohibited Assault weapon), even if it is marketed as “state compliant” or “Massachusetts compliant.”

The fact that a weapon is or has been marketed by the manufacturer on the basis that it is the same as or substantially similar to one or more Enumerated Weapons will be relevant to identifying whether the weapon is a Copy or Duplicate (and therefore a prohibited Assault weapon) under the applicable test(s).

Under Section 121, the Features Test in the former 18 U.S.C. section 921(a)(30) remains an independent basis for qualification as an Assault weapon.

If a weapon, as manufactured or originally assembled, is a Copy or Duplicate under one or both of the applicable tests, it remains a prohibited Assault weapon even if it is altered by the seller. Therefore, a Copy or Duplicate will be treated as an Assault weapon even if it is altered, for example, by pinning the folding or telescoping stock in a fixed position, by removing the pistol grip, by removing a bayonet mount or flash suppressor, or by preventing the weapon from accepting a detachable magazine.

Purely cosmetic similarities to an Enumerated Weapon, such as finish, appearance, or shape of the stock, or appearance or shape of the rail, will not be treated as relevant to a determination of whether a weapon is a Copy or Duplicate.

Application of this Enforcement Notice (dealers licensed under G.L. c. 140, § 122):

The Guidance will not be applied to future possession, ownership or transfer of Assault weapons by dealers, provided that the dealer has written evidence that the weapons were transferred to the dealer in the Commonwealth prior to July 20, 2016, and provided further that a transfer made after July 20, 2016, if any, is made to persons or businesses in states where such weapons are legal.

Application of this Enforcement Notice (individual gun owners):

The Guidance will not be applied to possession, ownership or transfer of an Assault weapon obtained prior to July 20, 2016.

The AGO reserves the right to alter or amend this guidance.



Huh - So apparently the Copy/Duplicate Guidance is in reference to the Enumerated Weapons list only.

Wonder when the 1st Mass. compliant MCX comes out, one without a folding stock or flash suppressor?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Another Justice Stewart type case... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2016 #1
"Hurry up ... and screw up" DonP Jul 2016 #2
Massachusetts is losing the battle of idiotic laws to California. pablo_marmol Jul 2016 #22
Their laws might be idiotic and have holes in them, but their AG is great for trying to fix them! scscholar Jul 2016 #26
Umm, nothing is being destroyed DonP Jul 2016 #27
That's why politicians have jobs shadowrider Jul 2016 #30
Indeed. pablo_marmol Jul 2016 #34
This message was self-deleted by its author pablo_marmol Jul 2016 #33
The MA AG isn't fixing a damn thing. pablo_marmol Jul 2016 #41
Well remember defining what you are regulating sarisataka Jul 2016 #3
"vague and overly broad" Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2016 #4
So... krispos42 Jul 2016 #5
"Somebody want to tell the GCRA crowd?" Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2016 #6
That quote indicates it is ALL about culture war. nt Eleanors38 Jul 2016 #7
er, what you just said is the exact opposite of what the AG said. Try to keep up. Schema Thing Jul 2016 #8
Um that is exactly sarisataka Jul 2016 #12
Actually, it is what she said. Straw Man Jul 2016 #36
Yes I saw that Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #17
Who is sending this directive? Hangingon Jul 2016 #9
The piece was written by the AG and published through the Globe (and elsewhere, I presume). Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2016 #11
Thx! I should have read closer. Hangingon Jul 2016 #16
If this is true... beevul Jul 2016 #10
Yup, the 1994 Federal AWB did *not* ban AR and AK variants that passed the features test. benEzra Jul 2016 #28
Well said, Ben. beevul Jul 2016 #31
It is a shame that 'knowing what one is doing" isn't a political criteria discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2016 #38
The failure discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2016 #13
I don't know why but discussions of legal concepts always fascinates me. Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2016 #14
I'm grateful that that is so and quite sorry so few pro-control folks share your fascination discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2016 #18
Your new rifle has a #4-40 screw holding the cover plate to the grip GreydeeThos Jul 2016 #15
The AG of this state TeddyR Jul 2016 #19
Basically the '94 ban... jmg257 Jul 2016 #20
Thanks TeddyR Jul 2016 #21
I know after reading NY's 1st ban way back when, I was quite surprised so many "copies" jmg257 Jul 2016 #23
I grew up Catholic and got use to the idea that... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2016 #24
Why, thank you! Couldn't have been a more benign post...just stats on increasing # of permits. jmg257 Jul 2016 #25
Like many other states, MA reported *zero* rifle homicides in 2014. benEzra Jul 2016 #29
Our AG is an idiot Jackieduda Jul 2016 #32
It will certainly be challenged. Straw Man Jul 2016 #35
Making up new criteria out of thin air... beevul Jul 2016 #43
Here's the actual "Enforcement Notice" jmg257 Jul 2016 #37
Semi auto deer rifles? DashOneBravo Jul 2016 #39
"Internal functioning components". Nt jmg257 Jul 2016 #40
Not that part DashOneBravo Jul 2016 #44
Great timing. pablo_marmol Jul 2016 #42
In the interest of... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2016 #45
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»The loophole in the Mass....»Reply #37