Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: The loophole in the Mass. assault weapons ban [View all]Straw Man
(6,816 posts)35. It will certainly be challenged.
You can't expect people to go by "the spirit of the law" when it's a law they despise in the first place. The law was sloppily written, and the AG is hoping to take advantage of that sloppiness to reinterpret it as she sees fit.
From the link:
But gun manufacturers have taken it upon themselves to define what a copy or duplicate weapon is. They market state compliant copycat versions of their assault weapons to Massachusetts buyers. They sell guns without a flash suppressor or folding or telescoping stock, for example, small tweaks that do nothing to limit the lethalness of the weapon.
This is absolutely false. It is the law itself that enumerates the features that constitute and "assault weapon." A version of the same rifle without those features does not fit the definition. That is not a "loophole." It is the letter of the law.
That will end now. On Wednesday, we are sending a directive to all gun manufacturers and dealers that makes clear that the sale of these copycat assault weapons is illegal in Massachusetts. With this directive, we will ensure we get the full protection intended when lawmakers enacted our assault weapons ban, not the watered-down version of those protections offered by gun manufacturers.
This is an attempted end-run that will not stand judicial scrutiny. If the current law is not having the desired effect, then try to amend the law. It is not the Attorney General's function to rewrite law.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Their laws might be idiotic and have holes in them, but their AG is great for trying to fix them!
scscholar
Jul 2016
#26
er, what you just said is the exact opposite of what the AG said. Try to keep up.
Schema Thing
Jul 2016
#8
The piece was written by the AG and published through the Globe (and elsewhere, I presume).
Nuclear Unicorn
Jul 2016
#11
Yup, the 1994 Federal AWB did *not* ban AR and AK variants that passed the features test.
benEzra
Jul 2016
#28
It is a shame that 'knowing what one is doing" isn't a political criteria
discntnt_irny_srcsm
Jul 2016
#38
I don't know why but discussions of legal concepts always fascinates me.
Nuclear Unicorn
Jul 2016
#14
I'm grateful that that is so and quite sorry so few pro-control folks share your fascination
discntnt_irny_srcsm
Jul 2016
#18
I know after reading NY's 1st ban way back when, I was quite surprised so many "copies"
jmg257
Jul 2016
#23