Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
Showing Original Post only (View all)‘Under the Gun’ Director Refuses to Apologize to ‘Radical’ Group [View all]
While Katie Couric finally expressed some regret for a deceptive edit in her anti-gun documentary, the director of Under the Gun remains defiant.
On Wednesday, Stephanie Soechtig told Variety magazine that had I known that the NRA would focus on eight seconds of a two-hour film, I might have done things differently. But I made the creative decision and I stand by it.
Soechtig also revealed her true anti-gun rights agenda when she huffed: If I wanted to make them [Virginia Citizens Defense League] look bad, I would have focused exclusively on their radical ideology. But I didnt do that. Later in the interview, Soechtig added: Its interesting that theyre focusing on whats not in the film instead of what is in the film, because if they focused on what is in the film, it would threaten their livelihood. This is very textbook gun-lobby intimidation tactics, and I wont be intimidated....There is a small but noisy fringe in this country. Theyve been really loud, and to be honest theyve been really successful in preventing our legislators from passing any meaningful legislation on this issue.
On her now infamous creative decision to misrepresent the VCDL members response, Soechtig explained: The terror watch list is a real pivotal feature in the film, as is the whole notion of background checks. So this felt like a really crucial time to stop down and allow the audience a moment to let that question sink in. She added that a documentary has a different standard than the nightly news has. When youre making a film like this, the goal is to get people to come to theaters to watch your film. You have to provide a thematic experience for them. I dont think we misconstrued any of the facts.
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/geoffrey-dickens/2016/06/02/under-gun-director-refuses-apologize-radical-group
On Wednesday, Stephanie Soechtig told Variety magazine that had I known that the NRA would focus on eight seconds of a two-hour film, I might have done things differently. But I made the creative decision and I stand by it.
Soechtig also revealed her true anti-gun rights agenda when she huffed: If I wanted to make them [Virginia Citizens Defense League] look bad, I would have focused exclusively on their radical ideology. But I didnt do that. Later in the interview, Soechtig added: Its interesting that theyre focusing on whats not in the film instead of what is in the film, because if they focused on what is in the film, it would threaten their livelihood. This is very textbook gun-lobby intimidation tactics, and I wont be intimidated....There is a small but noisy fringe in this country. Theyve been really loud, and to be honest theyve been really successful in preventing our legislators from passing any meaningful legislation on this issue.
On her now infamous creative decision to misrepresent the VCDL members response, Soechtig explained: The terror watch list is a real pivotal feature in the film, as is the whole notion of background checks. So this felt like a really crucial time to stop down and allow the audience a moment to let that question sink in. She added that a documentary has a different standard than the nightly news has. When youre making a film like this, the goal is to get people to come to theaters to watch your film. You have to provide a thematic experience for them. I dont think we misconstrued any of the facts.
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/geoffrey-dickens/2016/06/02/under-gun-director-refuses-apologize-radical-group
31 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
‘Under the Gun’ Director Refuses to Apologize to ‘Radical’ Group [View all]
SecularMotion
Jun 2016
OP
These people refuse to admit the 2A is an individual right....typical lying scumbag.
ileus
Jun 2016
#7
"...it would threaten their livelihood:" Hubris. It's not just for tomatoes.
Eleanors38
Jun 2016
#15
Guaranteed health care? Roof over everyone's head? Secure retirement? Great...
Eleanors38
Jun 2016
#21