Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Man Shot, Killed After Breaking Into Ex-Girlfriend's Home [View all]MillennialDem
(2,367 posts)30. More bullshit
They're doing no such thing. You have the same right of self-defense as they do.
Are you trying to say that this country is awash in guns because the elderly and infirm are arming themselves in self-defense? I hope not, because that would be a ridiculous claim.
They have a right to self defense, but they are putting me in harm's way by giving them guns. Taking away guns does not mean you lose your right to self defense.
Of course I'm not saying the country is awash in guns because of seniors. Don't take me for stupid, what in the actual fuck...
Do I need a link to prove to you that the bulk of gun crimes are committed by people with prior disqualifying convictions, i.e. "felons in possession"? Look at Table 7: 23% of state and 9.5% of federal offenders had no previous sentence. How many does that leave? You do the math.
http://bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/fuo.pdf
So what? It's easy to get a gun through a straw purchase, a shady dealer, or stealing one BECAUSE THE COUNTRY IS AWASH in guns. This has zero to do with whether the offenders have a sentence or not. When they still a gun or buy a gun for $1000 it's no big deal. If the act of carrying a gun was a felony criminal offense, guess how much black market guns would cost? It would be about $30,000 (what they are in Australia). So very few common criminals are going to have them, only the hardest of the hard, like Mafia members are going to routinely have them. And guess what, they aren't going to be mugging grandma.
Bingo! When guns are outlawed, only outlaws, etc.
More accurately: when guns are outlawed, only a few extreme outlaws will have them. Instead of any outlaw who wants one will have one (the current situation).
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
60 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The Kentucky woman who shot her boyfriend said she was giving him a nose job...
Human101948
Mar 2016
#1
So because of your article you want the woman in the OP disarmed? How does that make sense?
Nuclear Unicorn
Mar 2016
#3
The purpose of the OP is to demonstrate why the RKBA is to be protected. Does your post
Nuclear Unicorn
Mar 2016
#5
I'm not violent. Why should I just be happy that the extreme amount of guns in this
MillennialDem
Mar 2016
#11
I would obviously be violent in self defense. I'm supposed to be happy that
MillennialDem
Mar 2016
#15
So the physically strong are supposed to put our LIVES on the line for the
MillennialDem
Mar 2016
#17
You are absolutely suggesting it. Guns make the world less safe for me. So you are forcing me to
MillennialDem
Mar 2016
#19
Are you familiar with sophism? You're repeatedly straw manning my points, not understanding
MillennialDem
Mar 2016
#44
"a safe room could be constructed with a metal secure door and sandbags or old refrigerators."
Nuclear Unicorn
Mar 2016
#45
Why not? It would be bullet proof enough to deter most criminals. Sure it's not going to
MillennialDem
Mar 2016
#46
The belt would take up less space than sand bags and old refrigerators in my old
Nuclear Unicorn
Mar 2016
#49
Could have done it just fine in my 1 bedroom 600 square foot that 2 of us lived in. Would have just
MillennialDem
Mar 2016
#50
No and I will never support that industry of death. Interestingly, I do like
MillennialDem
Mar 2016
#52
I was curious if your assertion that things are "guns, guns, guns" was true.
Nuclear Unicorn
Mar 2016
#53
You wouldn't try to stop an assault on an elderly or infirm person if you were capable of doing so?
Marengo
Mar 2016
#22
If I was capable, of course. That's not the same thing as being in a country awash with guns which
MillennialDem
Mar 2016
#23
Ok, since you're weakening my strength, what's YOUR responsibility to me? And I will
MillennialDem
Mar 2016
#32
Thanks. Just hope you don't miss and hit me... or escalate the situation further.
MillennialDem
Mar 2016
#36