Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)

3. One good thing about this dust-up is that there IS a dust-up....

Reply to Eugene (Original post)

Fri Mar 11, 2016, 03:17 PM

Mar 2016

In years past, pro-gun control research was treated like pro-drug war research: Printed-as-written in vast quantities without any refutation or "other side" being presented.
Now, at least, there is some kind of pushback. But why the med journals? Do they have a publishing lock on gun research; is that the only stuff MSM will print?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Gun control study's dramatic results 'implausible', say leading researchers [View all] Eugene Mar 2016 OP

the fact that it was published in a medical journal gejohnston Mar 2016 #1

NY ditched its COBIS system in 2012. Straw Man Mar 2016 #2

One good thing about this dust-up is that there IS a dust-up.... Eleanors38 Mar 2016 #3

90% reduction is the rub jimmy the one Mar 2016 #4