Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Straw Man

(6,816 posts)
2. NY ditched its COBIS system in 2012.
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 02:44 AM
Mar 2016
http://nypost.com/2012/04/02/cuomo-whacks-pataki-gun-law/

It was expensive and didn't solve a single crime. Microstamping is just a new wrinkle on ballistic fingerprinting. A key difference is that old-style ballistic fingerprinting depended on reading the markings that were already there from the routine functioning of the firearm. Microstamping will create new marks specifically for ID purposes. However, it will be no more effective than COBIS was because it proceeds from the same flawed premise: that matching spent brass found at crime sites will enable arrests and prosecutions. That theory is full of holes, as has been explained time and time again and as has been proven by New York's example.

And of course the main difference is that COBIS was paid for by the state with tax money. Microstamping's costs will be borne by the manufacturers and consumers of firearms. And that's really the whole point, isn't it? Who cares about solving crimes? It's all about culture war and thinking of new ways to fuck with gun owners and manufacturers

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Gun control study's drama...»Reply #2