Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)
1. the fact that it was published in a medical journal
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 12:51 AM
Mar 2016

instead of a relevant publication says something in itself. It usually means it would fail. BTW, forensics experts point out microstamping doesn't work and would not solve a single crime and was sold to politicians by the one company that has the patent, and monopoly, on the technology.
http://arbalestquarrel.com/microstamping-work/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microstamping

Implementing three state gun control laws at the federal level could reduce the rate of American gun deaths by more than 90%, a new study has found.
I would like to see what this argument is based on, since two thirds of gun deaths are suicides. I think it is fair assumption that the weapon used is almost always recovered at the scene. BTW, we have had background checks for two decades.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Gun control study's drama...»Reply #1