Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Eugene

(62,885 posts)
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 07:58 PM Mar 2016

Gun control study's dramatic results 'implausible', say leading researchers [View all]

Source: The Guardian

Gun control study's dramatic results 'implausible', say leading researchers

Findings suggest implementing three state laws at federal level could
reduce the rate of US gun deaths by more than 90%, but experts say it’s
‘not good science’


Thursday 10 March 2016 23.30 GMT

Implementing three state gun control laws at the federal level could reduce the rate of American gun deaths by more than 90%, a new study has found.

But leading gun violence researchers have called that result “implausible”, and said the study’s design is so flawed that some of its findings are not believable.

The paper, published in the British medical journal The Lancet and written by researchers at Boston University, Columbia University and the University of Bern in Switzerland, found that one of the three most effective gun policies were laws requiring ballistic imaging or microstamping, which help law enforcement identify guns used in crimes.

Experts noted that the laws, which were on the books in only three states, were not actually being implemented in practice.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]


Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/mar/10/gun-control-study-flawed-researchers
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Gun control study's drama...»Reply #0