Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Drug Policy

seeviewonder

(461 posts)

2. As a chemist, this testing is worrisome.

Reply to Ohio Joe (Original post)

Wed May 2, 2012, 09:45 AM

May 2012

At a level of 5 ng/mL, the precision of any testing would be greatly reduced. This is in the parts per trillion range and this is such a small concentration that even the most advanced equipment would have trouble detecting and quantitatively measuring amounts of THC in a sample.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Marijuana DUI Bill Clears Big Colorado Hurdle [View all] Ohio Joe May 2012 OP

Bookmarking to follow thread. CrispyQ May 2012 #1

As a chemist, this testing is worrisome. seeviewonder May 2012 #2

Next week they will need to DocMac May 2012 #3

Blood levels are more accurate than urine levels RainDog May 2012 #4

Yeah, sure, I can do that Ohio Joe May 2012 #5

Great! thanks RainDog May 2012 #6