Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Civil Liberties

Showing Original Post only (View all)

mahatmakanejeeves

(61,946 posts)
Mon Nov 27, 2023, 08:07 AM Nov 2023

Trump hints at expanded role for the military within the US. A legacy law gives him few guardrails [View all]

POLITICS

Trump hints at expanded role for the military within the US. A legacy law gives him few guardrails

BY GARY FIELDS
Updated 12:03 AM EST, November 27, 2023

WASHINGTON (AP) — Campaigning in Iowa this year, Donald Trump said he was prevented during his presidency from using the military to quell violence in primarily Democratic cities and states. ... Calling New York City and Chicago “crime dens,” the front-runner for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination told his audience, “The next time, I’m not waiting. One of the things I did was let them run it and we’re going to show how bad a job they do,” he said. “Well, we did that. We don’t have to wait any longer.”

Trump has not spelled out precisely how he might use the military during a second term, although he and his advisers have suggested they would have wide latitude to call up units. While deploying the military regularly within the country’s borders would be a departure from tradition, the former president already has signaled an aggressive agenda if he wins, from mass deportations to travel bans imposed on certain Muslim-majority countries.

A law first crafted in the nation’s infancy would give Trump as commander in chief almost unfettered power to do so, military and legal experts said in a series of interviews. ... The Insurrection Act allows presidents to call on reserve or active-duty military units to respond to unrest in the states, an authority that is not reviewable by the courts. One of its few guardrails merely requires the president to request that the participants disperse.

“The principal constraint on the president’s use of the Insurrection Act is basically political, that presidents don’t want to be the guy who sent tanks rolling down Main Street,” said Joseph Nunn, a national security expert with the Brennan Center for Justice. “There’s not much really in the law to stay the president’s hand.”

{snip}
34 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Good grief, the tone of this article... EarlG Nov 2023 #1
Right you are and moniss Nov 2023 #3
Add a few provocateurs and any demonstration can become violent Ohioboy Nov 2023 #7
Like so many things Trump, it's straight out of the third world peppertree Nov 2023 #5
I would change that title stage left Nov 2023 #30
Trump is telling us who he is. We ignore him at our peril. Chainfire Nov 2023 #2
He's been telling us stage left Nov 2023 #31
Voters need to pay attention to what Cheetohlini is saying. Hermit-The-Prog Nov 2023 #4
His Republicans, for the most part, relish the idea though peppertree Nov 2023 #6
"Experts" are calmly discussing Trump's proposed military takeover like it's a normal thing. sop Nov 2023 #8
When a man shows you who and what he is, believe him. Magoo48 Nov 2023 #9
Why of course. Somebody's got to run the internment camps. jaxexpat Nov 2023 #10
What is going on in the military right now. Boomerproud Nov 2023 #11
This message was self-deleted by its author JohnSJ Nov 2023 #12
He has been saying for months he will go after his "enemies", so why should anyone be surprised by this? JohnSJ Nov 2023 #13
Speaking as a retired Army officer with 30 years of service: AverageOldGuy Nov 2023 #14
If Trump tries to use the military to lock in his total control, I see two possible scenarios: Cyrano Nov 2023 #16
Military personnel take an oath to the constitution, not to a dictator. If they are given an illegal order PortTack Nov 2023 #21
That all depends on who is running the military SouthernDem4ever Nov 2023 #24
They still take an oath to the constitution regardless! PortTack Nov 2023 #25
So did Drump, Barr and an assortment of other assholes like Flynn SouthernDem4ever Nov 2023 #26
Oaths stage left Nov 2023 #28
Under trump... El Mimbreno Nov 2023 #15
As I recall, DENVERPOPS Nov 2023 #17
It is a shame hackers can't access Maraloago data and finances. LiberalFighter Nov 2023 #18
It would just be a matter of time before Trump would institute some form of Marhsall Law, hadEnuf Nov 2023 #19
Marshal law can only be declared for two reasons. One, if local or state government has lost control PortTack Nov 2023 #22
I hope you are right. hadEnuf Nov 2023 #27
To quote a famous former president, "There he goes, again!" Ford_Prefect Nov 2023 #20
That's no "hint." n/t Harker Nov 2023 #23
You're right. stage left Nov 2023 #29
A promise to his adoring deplorables... Harker Nov 2023 #34
In his mind this is some form of MAGA Militia where he waves the Bible bucolic_frolic Nov 2023 #32
Trump has learned no one will stop him. Irish_Dem Nov 2023 #33
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Civil Liberties»Trump hints at expanded r...»Reply #0