Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Civil Liberties
Showing Original Post only (View all)Trump hints at expanded role for the military within the US. A legacy law gives him few guardrails [View all]
POLITICS
Trump hints at expanded role for the military within the US. A legacy law gives him few guardrails
BY GARY FIELDS
Updated 12:03 AM EST, November 27, 2023
WASHINGTON (AP) Campaigning in Iowa this year, Donald Trump said he was prevented during his presidency from using the military to quell violence in primarily Democratic cities and states. ... Calling New York City and Chicago crime dens, the front-runner for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination told his audience, The next time, Im not waiting. One of the things I did was let them run it and were going to show how bad a job they do, he said. Well, we did that. We dont have to wait any longer.
Trump has not spelled out precisely how he might use the military during a second term, although he and his advisers have suggested they would have wide latitude to call up units. While deploying the military regularly within the countrys borders would be a departure from tradition, the former president already has signaled an aggressive agenda if he wins, from mass deportations to travel bans imposed on certain Muslim-majority countries.
A law first crafted in the nations infancy would give Trump as commander in chief almost unfettered power to do so, military and legal experts said in a series of interviews. ... The Insurrection Act allows presidents to call on reserve or active-duty military units to respond to unrest in the states, an authority that is not reviewable by the courts. One of its few guardrails merely requires the president to request that the participants disperse.
The principal constraint on the presidents use of the Insurrection Act is basically political, that presidents dont want to be the guy who sent tanks rolling down Main Street, said Joseph Nunn, a national security expert with the Brennan Center for Justice. Theres not much really in the law to stay the presidents hand.
{snip}
Trump hints at expanded role for the military within the US. A legacy law gives him few guardrails
BY GARY FIELDS
Updated 12:03 AM EST, November 27, 2023
WASHINGTON (AP) Campaigning in Iowa this year, Donald Trump said he was prevented during his presidency from using the military to quell violence in primarily Democratic cities and states. ... Calling New York City and Chicago crime dens, the front-runner for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination told his audience, The next time, Im not waiting. One of the things I did was let them run it and were going to show how bad a job they do, he said. Well, we did that. We dont have to wait any longer.
Trump has not spelled out precisely how he might use the military during a second term, although he and his advisers have suggested they would have wide latitude to call up units. While deploying the military regularly within the countrys borders would be a departure from tradition, the former president already has signaled an aggressive agenda if he wins, from mass deportations to travel bans imposed on certain Muslim-majority countries.
A law first crafted in the nations infancy would give Trump as commander in chief almost unfettered power to do so, military and legal experts said in a series of interviews. ... The Insurrection Act allows presidents to call on reserve or active-duty military units to respond to unrest in the states, an authority that is not reviewable by the courts. One of its few guardrails merely requires the president to request that the participants disperse.
The principal constraint on the presidents use of the Insurrection Act is basically political, that presidents dont want to be the guy who sent tanks rolling down Main Street, said Joseph Nunn, a national security expert with the Brennan Center for Justice. Theres not much really in the law to stay the presidents hand.
{snip}
34 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump hints at expanded role for the military within the US. A legacy law gives him few guardrails [View all]
mahatmakanejeeves
Nov 2023
OP
"Experts" are calmly discussing Trump's proposed military takeover like it's a normal thing.
sop
Nov 2023
#8
He has been saying for months he will go after his "enemies", so why should anyone be surprised by this?
JohnSJ
Nov 2023
#13
If Trump tries to use the military to lock in his total control, I see two possible scenarios:
Cyrano
Nov 2023
#16
Military personnel take an oath to the constitution, not to a dictator. If they are given an illegal order
PortTack
Nov 2023
#21
It would just be a matter of time before Trump would institute some form of Marhsall Law,
hadEnuf
Nov 2023
#19