Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Civil Liberties

Showing Original Post only (View all)

sl8

(16,292 posts)
Sat Feb 25, 2023, 08:52 AM Feb 2023

North Carolina can't ban undercover filming inside animal farms [View all]

Last edited Sat Feb 25, 2023, 11:05 AM - Edit history (1)

https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2023/02/23/undercover-filming-ban-peta/

North Carolina can’t ban undercover filming inside animal farms

The Fourth Circuit ruled that a North Carolina law aimed at ending undercover investigations violates the First Amendment

By Rachel Weiner
February 23, 2023 at 5:02 p.m. EST

A North Carolina law aimed at stopping investigations by animal rights activists violates constitutional free speech protections, an appellate court ruled Thursday.

The 2015 law bars employees from going into “nonpublic areas of an employer’s premises” for reasons unrelated to work and gathering documents or making recordings that “breach the person’s duty of loyalty to the employer.”

It was one of a wave of laws passed across the country in response to undercover exposés of the mistreatment of animals in large factory farms. Every one challenged in federal court has been found at least in part unconstitutional, said David Muraskin of Public Justice, a legal nonprofit that led a group challenge to the law. This decision is particularly important, he said, because it ties together several elements used in other recent so-called “ag-gag laws” — it did not specifically target agriculture, it created civil liability rather than a new crime, and it focused on recording and data collection.

That the court still deemed the law unconstitutional shows, Muraskin said, “that the ability of people to conduct investigations and expose misconduct is protected by the First Amendment.”

[...]



On edit, link to decision (pdf) :

https://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinions/201776.P.pdf
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Civil Liberties»North Carolina can't ban ...»Reply #0