Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

90-percent

(6,910 posts)
10. I remember that!
Tue Oct 11, 2022, 02:21 PM
Oct 2022

Bad memory, but I think around 2006-2008 John Roberts ruled; (in so many words) Since racism in the USA is a thing of the pasts, there's many parts off the Voting Rights Act (1965?) that are no longer needed. Shortly, or immediately, Republican racists changed the laws/rules in their states to immediately suppress the votes of minorities and college students and any demographic that may lean Democratic.

SC has been moving the goal line since the ludicrous Bush v. Gore ruling of around 2000. Stunk so bad they put into it that it should never be used as a legal precedent. The SC is not on the side of the people or Democracy itself. But, to be fair, they are totally ga-ga over 26th Century Catholic religious doctrine and totalitarian fascism.

-90% Jimmy

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Civil Liberties»North Carolina HBCU leade...»Reply #10