Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Civil Liberties

SWBTATTReg

(24,603 posts)

2. You got it, man. Nailed it on the nail head. It's ridiculous considering the sheer amount of

Reply to exboyfil (Reply #1)

Mon Jul 11, 2022, 01:43 PM

Jul 2022

IRS resources spent in such an intensive audit vs. a relatively lower earner ($100 K or less, and probably even a higher threshold of income here, I'm guessing).

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Demanding that the IRS go against political enemies (such as what tRUMP and his IRS Commissioner [View all] SWBTATTReg Jul 2022 OP

Auditing a public worker exboyfil Jul 2022 #1

You got it, man. Nailed it on the nail head. It's ridiculous considering the sheer amount of SWBTATTReg Jul 2022 #2

While that would make sense, I believe it is also not true. Salviati Jul 2022 #3

Those 'audits' that are done still are the easier, more simple of audits to do, hence those w/ SWBTATTReg Jul 2022 #4

Agreed, which is really dumb.... Salviati Jul 2022 #5

Exactly. As an auditor, I've always wondered at this stupid decision tree that they used SWBTATTReg Jul 2022 #6