Civil Liberties

probable cause. Other than what was found in the case, meth has nothing to do with the rendering at all. You think the precedent set only applies to meth? I don't get it.

The dogs themselves are a form or search that should require at least probable cause (reasonable suspicion, I sez), not a method to find probable cause. What kind of horseshit is that? Liberal justices my fucking ass. You cannot always side with power to the government from the people and be liberal.

For any folks that only have one benchmark, Roe v. Wade, you might want to wrap your heads around the actual basis of the decision which is PRIVACY. Silly folks pooh pooing privacy concerns will be stuck with their thumbs up their patooties as the whole works come apart around us, crown jewels and all.