Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hlthe2b

(107,144 posts)
1. There are free speech exceptions...
Sat Jul 17, 2021, 06:42 AM
Jul 2021

Categories of speech that are given lesser or no protection by the First Amendment (and therefore may be restricted) include obscenity, fraud, child pornography, speech integral to illegal conduct, speech that incites imminent lawless action, speech that violates intellectual property law, true threats, and commercial speech such as advertising. Defamation that causes harm to reputation is a tort and also an exception to free speech.


I'm as pro-civil liberties as any on DU, but it is simply not true that there was no basis for the judge's decision.

Arguably this COULD (and apparently WAS by the homeowners' group) construed as obscenity and incitement to lawless action. The judge apparently agreed.

It is a fine line and you can disagree, certainly, but I haven't seen ACLU pick this up (as they have marching rights for KKK and other disdainful examples) so, we shall see.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Civil Liberties»N.J. woman must remove an...»Reply #1