Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100220882209
I can't pick a favorite because I've been photographing since about 1970, and my first camera lens was a macro lens, also suitable for regular photography, specifically for flowers.
However, one flower sticks out, Canterbury Bells, because they grew at the family home.
I took this one on a trip.
I do remember white and blue.
They were campanula persicifolia, with petals that are barely flared. You are more likely to find campanula medium, which really look like little bells. I should drop the distinction. They are all very beautiful.
More as they come to me, but I am biased by photos I took, which become "favorites" by association.
I can't pick a favorite because I've been photographing since about 1970, and my first camera lens was a macro lens, also suitable for regular photography, specifically for flowers.
However, one flower sticks out, Canterbury Bells, because they grew at the family home.
I took this one on a trip.
I do remember white and blue.
They were campanula persicifolia, with petals that are barely flared. You are more likely to find campanula medium, which really look like little bells. I should drop the distinction. They are all very beautiful.
More as they come to me, but I am biased by photos I took, which become "favorites" by association.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
39 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read