Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ancestry/Genealogy

In reply to the discussion: I got back into gen. [View all]

wnylib

(25,013 posts)
14. It's very common for people to claim
Thu Dec 3, 2020, 07:42 PM
Dec 2020

"an Indian Princess" as an ancestor. It annoys Native people for two reasons.

One is that most Native tribal nations in North America (north of the Rio Grande) did not have hereditary rulers. In the ones that formed confederacies by consent or conquest, like the Algonquian tribes of New England or the Algonquians in the Virginia region, the son of a leader often took his father's place when the father died. The son had to be old enough and experienced enough to lead, but he could be challenged. Inherited leadership was not guaranteed.

So when someone says they have an Indian princess ancestor, it reveals that they know nothing about the people they claim to descend from and that probably there was no Native ancestor.

The second reason that it annoys Native people is that it sounds racist to them, as if an ordinary person isn't good enough, but a "princess" makes Native ancestry acceptable and exotic or glamorous.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Ancestry/Genealogy»I got back into gen.»Reply #14