Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hlthe2b

(106,791 posts)
4. Treating the ulcers does not rid the body of the parasites. Ivermectin would be necessary regardless
Fri Oct 20, 2023, 12:22 PM
Oct 2023

or another antiparasitic drug. If visceral Leishmaniasis is present, a slightly less toxic form of amphotericin B is the treatment of choice. At that point, liver damage is typically extensive, and quite obviously amphotericin B is not an easy drug on the liver and kidneys--actually quite toxic, albeit this newer formulation a bit less so.

And no, Ivermectin is not given in a low "throw-away" dose--even for early infection with Leishmaniasis parasites. Despite the COVID-related idiocy, Ivermectin is actually quite a useful drug--just not for viral infections. What even the typical physician with little infectious disease-- much less virology-- background misses, is that invitro, nearly any drug, and one hell of a lot of ubiquitous substances can deter viral replication for many enveloped viruses. Of course that does not play out in the body--something that seems to be possible to differentiate for some.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Health»A Nasty Tropical Skin Dis...»Reply #4