Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gormy Cuss

(30,884 posts)
16. Link to a Northwestern page referencing this study
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 08:10 PM
Aug 2012
http://www.feinberg.northwestern.edu/news/2012/08/sex_normalization.html

and an excerpt:
The pregnant women targeted are at risk for having a child born with the condition congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH), an endocrinological condition that can result in female fetuses being born with intersex or more male-typical genitals and brains. Women genetically identified as being at risk are given dexamethasone, a synthetic steroid, off-label starting as early as week five of the first trimester to try to “normalize” the development of those fetuses, which are female and CAH-affected. Because the drug must be administered before doctors can know if the fetus is female or CAH-affected, only one in eight of those exposed are the target type of fetus.

The off-label intervention does not prevent CAH; it aims only at sex normalization. Like Diethylstilbestrol (DES) – which is now known to have caused major fertility problems and fatal cancers among those exposed in utero – dexamethasone is a synthetic steroid. Dexamethasone is known – and in this case intended – to cross the placental barrier and change fetal development. Experts estimate the glucocorticoid dose reaching the fetus is 60 to 100 times what the body would normally experience.

The new report provides clear evidence that:

For more than 10 years, medical societies repeatedly but ultimately impotently expressed high alarm at use of this off-label intervention outside prospective clinical trials, because it is so high risk and because nearly 90 percent of those exposed cannot benefit.

Mothers offered the intervention have been told it “has been found safe for mother and child” but in fact there has never been any such scientific evidence.


Disgusting on every level.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

By chance I read this while watching... Deep13 Aug 2012 #1
Which is odd since we pioneered eugenics in the US 4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #11
True, and ironically it was part of the progressive movement. Deep13 Aug 2012 #17
This is totally outrageous if true. Has it been independently verified ProgressiveProfessor Aug 2012 #2
The Advocate is as legit a source as the New York Times obamanut2012 Aug 2012 #4
Link to a Northwestern page referencing this study Gormy Cuss Aug 2012 #16
This seems a total ignoring of normal study standards...just incredible ProgressiveProfessor Aug 2012 #22
Yes, it appears that Maria New ignored all normal study standards. Gormy Cuss Aug 2012 #29
Only a tiny fraction of lesbians and tomboys have the medical condition pnwmom Aug 2012 #3
Two thoughts lumberjack_jeff Aug 2012 #5
I don't believe in fetus engineering or Eugenics of any kind obamanut2012 Aug 2012 #7
What if there were a way to prevent blindness or deafness in the womb? pnwmom Aug 2012 #8
That's a little different. Deep13 Aug 2012 #18
Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia can cause a multitude of symptoms, pnwmom Aug 2012 #19
Sounds serious. Deep13 Aug 2012 #25
The problem is that in some children it can be very serious, but not in all. pnwmom Aug 2012 #26
What about the 2nd part? 4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #12
Nothing to do with my OP obamanut2012 Aug 2012 #13
I respectfully disagree 4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #14
I think your questions have been pretty well answered by researchers already. pnwmom Aug 2012 #27
Thank you 4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #31
i think behavioral modification in fetus' is a horrifying thought La Lioness Priyanka Aug 2012 #34
Horrifying. nt redqueen Aug 2012 #6
But can't they decide after they grow up to be gay anyway? FLyellowdog Aug 2012 #9
It will happen 4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #10
So it's fine to abort these fetuses but not to try to treat them? pnwmom Aug 2012 #20
I never said that 4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #30
I am very horrified. :( Starry Messenger Aug 2012 #15
Only a tiny fraction of lesbians and tomboys have the medical condition pnwmom Aug 2012 #21
Well, I find the whole philosophy behind it pretty spiritually bankrupt. Starry Messenger Aug 2012 #23
I don't agree with this treatment either, because the benefits don't outweigh the risks, IMO. pnwmom Aug 2012 #24
Genetically engineered "Stepford Wives"? Zorra Aug 2012 #35
A new kind of eugenics??? MrMickeysMom Aug 2012 #28
This is the way I believe the issue of LGBT is headed... MicaelS Aug 2012 #32
I've often thought that might prove to be a cruel irony 4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #36
Tell them eating pork is, too obamanut2012 Aug 2012 #41
a future without butch girls, is not a future worth living in La Lioness Priyanka Aug 2012 #33
lol! Zorra Aug 2012 #37
no, really La Lioness Priyanka Aug 2012 #38
hahaha Thread Win! obamanut2012 Aug 2012 #39
I don't ever feel feminine or masculine. Neoma Aug 2012 #40
The LGBTIQ spectrum is a huge tent. Zorra Aug 2012 #42
Congenital adrenal hyperplasia FloridaJudy Aug 2012 #43
Question haikugal Oct 2012 #44
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Feminists»A future without tomboys ...»Reply #16